I'm a peace-loving married Indian male on the right side of '50 with
college-going children, and presently employed under government.
Educationally I've a master's degree in History, and another in Computer
Application. Besides, I've a post graduate diploma in Management. My
published works are:- (1)"In Harness", ISBN 81-8157-183-5, a poetry
collections and (2) "The Remix of Orchid", ISBN 978-81-7525-729-0, a
short story collections with a foreword by Mr. Ruskin Bond, (3)
"Virasat", ISBN 978-81-7525-982-9, again a short story collection but in
Hindi, (4) "Ek Saal Baad," ISBN 978-81-906496-8-1, my second Story
Collection in Hindi.
It's quite a feeling to revisit one's old creation. It's like meeting an old friend that catapults the mood to the realm of nostalgia. The force of longing overpowers the imagination. 'Aha! If only I got back my old muse!' It's like old love, always refreshing, always inspiring. And this is how I can describe my mood as I decide to post my old poem "The Last Piece". It's from my book of poem collections "In Harness" ISBN 81-8157-183-5 published in 2004.
THE LAST PIECE ============== One morbid afternoon Her husband slept his last Not to wake up again.
The cry calmed After thirteen days of flurry Of feast and fast, hymns and alms.
Thus she became a widow And lost her right to silk and gold In the sixty-third year of her life.
The gold she rescued Time and again from usurers’ grips Wouldn’t adorn her wrists any more.
Nor the wedding sari She long preserved in naphthalene Would ever swathe her body.
Armed with their right of inheritance The officious daughters-in-law Accosted the sobbing soul.
And they grabbed the gold, All by themselves, taking her nod for granted To the last retrievable piece.
Like an accident victim immobile She witnessed the marauders looting, Their qualm killed and compunction crippled.
At the end of the agonising spell Her wedding sari was only left Out-of-fashion and undistinguished.
The dilapidated silk Redolent of unsung glory Would stay alive till her final journey.
Husband lost to heaven And sons to daughters-in-law, She would live a life of destitute now.
Approaching fast the chilly December A time to scrabble about the wardrobe For a bundle of benevolent warmth.
She would grab the sari Perforce, in those freezing nights To wrap her body, and not to wear it. ----------------- Visakhapatnam 01=06=1999 ------------------------------------------------------------------- By A. N. Nanda Muzaffarpur 17-03-2009 -------------------------------------------------------------------
"The World is Flat"--Sitting on the Cusp of a New Millennium
"The World is Flat" by Thomas L. Friedman, Paperback, ISBN 978-0-1410-3489-8, pages-660, Penguin Books 2006 ------------------------------------------
Aha! What a relief! Finally I have reached the end of the flat world. It has been a momentous journey, I must say. Not by jet plane, nor by any cruising ocean-liner, nor by hitch-hiking. It is a journey through the voluminous revised edition of Thomas Friedman's "The World is Flat".
As I started poring over the initial few chapters, they gave me an impression that I was reading something about the technological progress that got shaped in the last couple of decades of twentieth century. Then as I progressed, the book unfolded its scheme, chapter by chapter and section by section, explaining with examples how business flourished on the wake of some path-breaking technologies. The new business processes embraced wider platforms with trans-continental connectivity giving rise to greater collaboration; the vertical organisations slowly withered away yielding place for horizontal participation; the work flow disaggregated itself so as to get distributed component by component among those who showed their abilities to perform them more efficiently and at lower cost. At this stage I came to know that the book was trying to explain the new phenomenon called outsourcing and the plight of American people, left in the lurch, who happened to face the grim consequences of the flight of their jobs. It was like a seismic transformation that nobody on earth could have ever averted. With a concern for his fellow countrymen rendered jobless because of the paradigm shift, the author opened his bundle of prescriptions, painstakingly researched and forcefully presented, not only for the readers to appreciate them but also for the US govt. to follow. Then my journey through the thicket of narratives progressed. Now it was the turn to discuss how the new environment threw open a plethora of opportunities for all those who were willing to adapt themselves and who could imagine and act with firm conviction that the new technologies and the collaborating platform would deliver. In fact, the age of liberation and entrepreneurship had finally arrived when the big started doing small and small the big not for their sheer existence but for excellence. At this point I thought I was reading a 'how-to' treatise written for aspiring entrepreneurs, and it happened to be a really inspiring one at that. As I neared the end, the book was having something really brilliant to offer. Here the author turned a concerned citizen of the globe. How to arrest the progress of those non-state terrorists who, along with the peace-loving entrepreneurs, equally benefitted from the new technologies became the focus of his narratives. To cut the long narratives short, the book not only imparted to me everything about a flat world but also made me circle the globe-many times before I reached its concluding chapter.
This is how I read Friedman's "The World is Flat", not at a stretch but slowly and on and off during the last couple of months, and all the while I had only one thing to guard against: I should not miss even a paragraph out of this. The pressure of an unfinished book should not lead me to resort to that. In fact I could not afford to. It is a book full of anecdotes culled together from author's extensive study tours around four continents, gathered from his extensive interviews of CEOs of forward-looking enterprises, the organisers of NGOs, the top names in research and policy planning, the economists engaged in comprehending and explaining the unprecedented twists and turns of the new millennium, the students grappling for directions.... Sometimes it may appear as if Friedman has got his words echoed back to him from his subjects of interview, especially when he is seeking to validate his pet phrase, the eponymous phrase "The Flat Word", but on the whole, his narratives are only too gripping, each of their words emphatically and logically supporting the conclusion he seeks to derive. He is way too generous in mentioning names of all those people he met and interviewed-and there are many from India and China gloriously referred to-so much so that it appeared as if Friedman is a clever blogger linking all the bloggers that come his way so that the popularity of his blog shoots up for a win-win blogging strategy! While discussing the challenges ahead and the means available to us to overcome them, the author turns a preacher, one who has the necessary spiritual insight into the paradoxes of the twenty-first century. He throws bare the soul of a worried man, a concerned man whose only worry seems to be: Can we leave behind us a world safer than what we see today, protected from the annihilating contrivance of Bin Laden and his ilk, from the scourge of human miseries in the unflat part of the world, from the ever-threatening curse of energy shortage, from preventable diseases and premature deaths...
Really, the world has come a long way since 11/9 and it should not be allowed to go back into the ice age merely because there has been a 9/11 !
China and India are the focal points, referred to throughout the book for right reasons: how the former has shaped itself as the great manufacturing hub and the latter the world's most industry-savvy service provider, an outsourcing paradise. It is an interesting conclusion that these two countries getting integrated into the supply chains in fact decided to avert wars. Fine, it is so when we think empirically. But then again, here Friedman is talking of two countries with different political systems, India with her democracy getting firmly rooted elections after elections and governments after government and China with her communism, or rather market socialism for whatever it means, and with its record of Tiananmen Square. What does Friedman intend to conclude? Is it that in flat world it does not matter whether the system is communist or democratic so long as it is perceived as a cheap place from the point of view of American business? It is a fact many books written in the subject just merrily gloss over. Well, we cannot just hold it against such a brilliantly written treatise.
There is another aspect that begs the critics' attention. Is Friedman subscribing to a theory of determinism despite his glorification of democracy, free trade and technological excellence in the field of IT? History shows that empires were built soon after sixth century BC when iron smelting was discovered, the metal that totally transformed the weaponry and military organisation. Similar is the case of Industrial Revolution on the wake of the discovery of steam engine. So, why shouldn't it be the case with the way we presently organise our socio-economic activities and political institutions with the establishment of fibre-optic trans-continental cables and satellites beaming bits and bytes over us 24 x 7 x 365? But then again, there is also Hegelian dialecticism-how thesis gives rise to antithesis and how the interplay of both the forces gives rise to synthesis. So when flat world creates a collaborative platform, supply chains, its unbridled use by the terrorists throw the necessary antithesis. What remains to be explained is the shape of synthesis to come. Friedman has not hinted anything about that; probably it is not his scheme to predict and prophesy. Now the book leaves much to think through and conclude. It is at best a book with the past well explained, the present well elaborated but the future simply glossed over. _______________________________ By A. N. Nanda 08-03-2009 Muzaffarpur _______________________________
It is not necessary that poetry has to be always spontaneous; a lot of tweaking must go into it to endow it with readability and poetic essence. At least that is my experience. But there are occasions when it comes just like that. One such occasion I have earlier narrated about in my blog is under caption “Poem by Fluke”, recapitulating how I was able to scribble something as I was being video graphed for a programme on the local television. But then again, what I wrote there in my first attempt had to undergo a lot of polishing before I could bring it on my blog. And yet I can’t say it ultimately turned out to be a wholesome poetic recipe.
Yesterday something as serendipitous as that happened just in front of me.On this occasion, though, the poet imbued with rhapsodic surge was not me.
Bharatiya Yuva Sahityakar Parishad, a literary society in Patna invited me as the chief guest for their function. I was to release the annual issue of their magazine, “Avakash”. In time I released the magazine, addressed the gathering of writers as one among the speakers in the dais, and then sat there listening to the recital of poems by the poets themselves. All of them were in Hindi and they were poignant from the very outset, riveting my attention to the fullest extent all through. Themes were varied but there were quite a few dealing with social evils like corruption and female foeticide. One of the memorable poems, the one composed and read out by one Shri Ram Yatan Yadav, intensified the tone of poignancy to its height as he worded the cry of a female foetus in her mother’s womb appealing her father not to make her die there. I was moved by this.
I was just guessing if the impact of that poem was same upon all listening to that. Yes, maybe, if the silence of the audience was to be taken as their compelling attention...no, it may not be, for by this time I had gathered that all present there were poets, patiently waiting for their turns to recite. And in the mean time the recital reached its concluding moment. At that very spur, as the presiding person at the dais invited if anyone else was still left to recite, I saw a young man, Zishan by name, came with his poem. From his introductory brief it became clear that the poem he was going to recite was freshly written, right on the spot, inspired by the same poem that deeply affected me a little while ago. And what was more, it happened to be the maiden attempt of Zishan in trying something poetic.
Let me reproduce it:
§ÉÚhÉ ½þiªÉÉ (By VÉÒ¶ÉÉxÉ +½þºÉxÉ)
बेटी, करके मैं तेरी ह्त्या, तुझपे कर रहा हूँ उपकार
बरना ये दुनिया, रस्मों रिवाज से जकड कर, कर देता तेरा जीना दुश्वार
बेटी, मैं भी करता हूँ तुझसे बहुत प्रेम और तुझसे भी है ममता
पर क्या करून इस दुमुहें समाज से बचाने की नहीं है क्षमता ।
Now, I’m going to translate it for those readers who would have difficulty in reading Hindi. It goes something like this:
Daughter, the apple of my eye
I’m only doing you a favour killing you
The world is full of deadly rituals
They would make your life only abysmal.
Daughter, the apple of my eye
I still love you despite this
Undone, I’m trapped in the realm of sham
Incapable of saving your life, at last.
The idea behind the poem may or may not be great. Like one may decry it saying that the poem does not speak of love, nor does it articulate a father’s helplessness; it is only an attempt to justify the heinous crime called female foeticide. Some may say that the poem depicts the virulence of a society where future of human race is sacrificed for the safety of a lethal present. But despite everything, there is a good dose of poetic prowess in Zishan’s instant verse. It has a perfect rhyme and it has a feeling integrated in expression. It has emotions intensified. Top of all it is instantaneous, a poem by fluke.