The Residue of Love
The Residue of Love
Some
people believe that true love and genuine knowledge outlive the body—that they
turn immortal, transcending the cycle of birth and death. Kishore never
accepted this romantic metaphysics. To him, such theories were often floated by
“any Tom, Dick, and Harry” who lacked both logic and evidence, yet proclaimed
their beliefs as eternal truths.
“Yes,
knowledge can outlive a person,” Kishore argued, “but only through books,
institutions, and students. Wealth survives through inheritance or philanthropy.
But don’t call it mystical, and don’t tell me that people are reborn with the
same wisdom or love. It’s always a hoax! Some even claim to remember their past
lives and narrate them like polished TED Talks—no contradictions, no
glitches—just pure fiction marketed as metaphysics!”
Kishore
grew up questioning everything—enough to unsettle priests, astrologers, and
elderly neighbours. At college, he formed a Freethinkers’ Circle that
became infamous for grilling teachers with uncomfortable questions.
Once,
during a lecture, the teacher remarked, “We are the product of our choices—that
is the law of Karma.” Kishore disagreed. Not everyone, he argued, is blessed
with options.
He asked,
“Sir, how did you come to college today?”
“By a
rickshaw,” the lecturer replied.
“And who
was pulling it?”
“The
rickshaw puller, of course.”
“And why
was he pulling it and not you?”
“It was
his rickshaw—his choice,” the lecturer said confidently.
Kishore
then asked, “Was it really his choice—or simply the absence of choices?”
Silence.
“You
can’t label the absence of choice as choice. That’s utter misguidance,” Kishore
concluded.
The
teacher took offence and marched to the principal. The principal counselled
Kishore gently: “You have the tendency to observe everything only in parts.
Wisdom will come with maturity. Wait for the right age.”
To
Kishore, this was a standard spiritual tactic—a convenient way to marginalise
questioning minds: branding youth as immature, curiosity as insolence, and
independence as indiscipline. Society, he felt, preferred obedient followers to
thinking individuals.
The
parents of such rebellious boys dreaded vacations. When the Freethinkers
returned home, they debated with pandits and astrologers, creating such chaos
that parents would hurriedly pack them back to their hostels.
Once,
when someone asked Kishore in a critical tone why the Freethinkers’ Circle
had no women members, he replied, “They’re watching us—our stand on gender
equality and our rebellion against male dominance. Just wait—soon they’ll join
us and lead from the front.”
Everyone
predicted a bleak future for the group: “No company wants a doubting Thomas!”
Yet life
surprised everyone—all ten Freethinkers secured respectable jobs. They had
merely “suspended questioning temporarily” for interviews. Kishore, their
leader, even landed a top government post.
His
secret?
“I never
stopped arguing. I just changed my tone—‘I may be mistaken… with due
respect… sorry to differ, sir… there’s another perspective…’ That’s how you
win without offending.”
Marriage,
however, was where Kishore drew a firm line. He believed marriage turned
spirited minds into obedient conformists. Eight of them eventually married
(some even shamefully embraced dowry), but Kishore and another hardcore
Freethinker held out. Families panicked:
- “We will die without seeing our bahu
and grandson!”
- “Those who die without a grandson go to
hell!”
- “Unmarried men suffer strange
illnesses—migraines, night attacks—even a churail comes in dreams
as a wife, sucks their blood, and inflicts diseases no doctor can
diagnose!”
Finally,
an elderly man arrived at Kishore’s home with a peculiar request.
One of
the Freethinkers—the ninth in their band of ten—had refused to marry, and his
mother was heartbroken. After the doctors’ prognosis on her health, she was
convinced she would die of grief within six months, even before the onset of
her third heart attack. Since Kishore was the group’s leader, only he could
persuade her son.
Kishore
agreed—but when he tried to convince his friend, the friend set one condition:
“Only if you marry too.”
And so,
at forty, Kishore and his friend married two educated sisters, aged
thirty-eight and thirty-six. The Freethinkers didn’t fuss over beauty or
horoscopes—and certainly not dowries. The brides took just one vow:
“We will
remain Freethinkers after marriage.”
The
vow-taking was neither ceremonial mumbo-jumbo nor sacrosanct. Kishore simply
handed his bride a register documenting the Circle’s discussions—their
ideological heritage. That was the formal initiation before the two women
became the perfect match for Kishore and his friend.
That
evening, with Kishore, his father, and sister seated in the car, the procession
set off for the bride’s house. Barely a quarter of a mile away, Kishore asked
the driver for his licence. It had expired. Horrified at the thought of being
stopped and forced to bribe his way out—illegal and unethical—Kishore returned
alone on foot to fetch his own licence. The elders protested that returning
once the baraat had begun was inauspicious, but Kishore dismissed the
superstition.
It was
around 8 p.m. The road lay dark under a canopy of silence—no streetlights, no
movement. Near an old banyan tree, an elderly woman in a white sari appeared
and softly asked, “Will you take me along?”
“The car
is full,” Kishore replied.
She
smiled. “No matter—I’ll sit on the roof.”
Kishore
laughed. “It’s a car, Mataji, not a bus!”
Her eyes
glowed with an odd tenderness. “I’ve waited for this opportunity for years,”
she said gently.
When
Kishore asked who she was, she didn’t give a name—only said, “I am your best
well-wisher.”
Before he
could ask more, she had vanished into the darkness.
Later
that night: Kishore was driving. The hired driver—licence expired and
conscience equally questionable—had fallen asleep beside him, snoring softly.
As the night deepened, fatigue crept in; the road stretched like a dull ribbon
under the headlights.
And then,
in that eerie half-second between waking and sleep, the woman in the white sari
flashed into view, running across the road straight toward the car.
Instinct
snapped him awake. He slammed the brakes. The car screeched. The passengers
lurched forward, startled and disoriented. Kishore gripped the wheel, his pulse
hammering—but said nothing. For a man who had spent decades mocking ghost
stories, admitting this would destroy his rationalist image. One word, and he’d
become the very legend he had spent his life debunking.
Instead,
he opened the flask and poured himself a cup of tea, letting the hot liquid
burn his throat and his sleep away. It was a conscious violation of the
wedding-night fast that forbade food or drink before the ceremonial palm-tying.
Better to break a ritual than break his neck on the highway!
He
reached the bride’s house safely, married, and returned home the next morning.
During
the post-wedding lunch, a relative joked, “First serve food to Kishore’s
aunt—his father’s sister. If her spirit isn’t fed, she’ll come demanding
answers! She’s a dabang even in the afterworld!”
Everyone
laughed—except Kishore. The remark struck him like lightning. His paternal
aunt, the only soul who had loved him as fiercely as his mother, had died when
he was in Class V. She had only one wish—to live long enough to lead Kishore’s
wedding procession. Fate was merciless. A swift, cruel snakebite had taken her
before she could see that day.
That
afternoon, Kishore accompanied the cook to the coconut grove, where food was
traditionally offered to the departed. As always, stray dogs and crows came to
eat. But now, the events of the previous night began to align in his mind.
Could
that gentle woman in the white sari have been his aunt? If she hadn’t woken
him… would the car have crashed? Would his bride have been widowed on her
wedding night?
Kishore
never spoke of it—not to his wife even, not to his Freethinker friends. For the
next twenty years of married life, he carried one quiet, disobedient thought:
Perhaps
love does survive the body—not as mysticism, but as lingering concern; a
residue in the air, a vibration that returns when needed.
A
Freethinker remained a Freethinker. But one night, love had out-reasoned him.
--------------------------------
By
Ananta Narayan Nanda
Bhubaneswar
7-11-2025
-----------------------------------
To get the author's English novel Ivory Imprint, (ebook), please visit the Amazon link at https://amzn.in/d/8B3V96H
To get the author's English novel Ivory Imprint (paperback), please visit the Amazon link at https://amzn.in/d/egyKzZA
Labels: short story

13 Comments:
Although such out of the world stories are so common in the Indian subcontinent yet this "The Residue of Love" was capable of giving me goosebumps. Perhaps in the credit goes to the writing skills of my friend Nanda who can convert an ordinary stuff into a gold mine of emotions, excitement and mystery.
Thanks a lot, my friend, you have made me look special. For me it's enough that the story appealed you for the reasons you mentioned. Expect you to repeat your visit to my blog more often...and encourage me.
Beautiful story.Your skil of narrating a simple situation to an art is commendable.🙏
Excellent piece of writing. Superb down to earth thought and skill to put right words in right place🙏🙏
Thank you for your kind words.
Sir you are gifted writer.A very captivating narrative art and beautifully written
Thanks a ton, Sareen Saheb. Your kind words are very encouraging. And I'm happy that my story is able to rise up to your likings.🙏
Very natural and smooth writing .Easy to read. and keeps the reader glued till the end .
Thank you for your kind words. 🙏
A really heart warming story. Very beautifully narrated - especially the unexpected twist in the tale. Thoroughly enjoyed reading this story from end to end. Kudos to dear Nandajifor his amazing story writing skills.
Thanks a lot for sharing your thoughts on the story. And more so for your kind words about the quality of writing.
Very captivating story. I will not say that Kishore became a believer after that one incident from his earlier staunch, non-believer mindset. But, probably, the incidence made him think that there could be another perspective, something beyond someone's firm beliefs. It is easy to ask questions than to answer them. Often, people with scientific bent of mind are known to ask questions (logical, I agree) that common people find it difficult to answer. Nothing wrong with that. We must ask questions, not believe everything blindly. But, is it that the questions, at least some of them, really have no logical answers? Isn't there a possibility that answers do exist but are much beyond the understanding, knowledge, and mental capacity of common people? Further, isn't there a possibility that, even if someone is capable of answering the questions, the common people cannot comprehend/understand those answers? From such lack of understanding, stem the disbelief, the stubbornness, the rigidity. For example, there are innumerable things written in our scriptures, which could be summarily dismissed by scientists, doctors etc. as rubbish, superstitions, flights of imagination, myths, and so on. But, isn't there a possibility that we have not reached that level of intelligence yet, to be able to interpret and understand them (at least some of them, if not all) correctly? Not a generalisation across the board for everything, but there is a possibility that even in this era of scientific and technological advancement, some things are still beyond our understanding and that answers/explanations to some of those could be found some day. I am not taking any sides, just raising some questions. Answers may or may not be there. Just some food for thought. Really appreciate the story-telling skills of Nanda ji.
Dear Okhde ji. Yours is such a deep insight into the issues which the story merely touches upon! You're right, ambivalence is rather more prevalent than the state of certainty. I'm happy to note that the story generates this kind of inquiry and reflections. And thank you, Okhde ji, for sharing your thoughts.
Post a Comment
<< Home